Art4agriculture Young Farming Champions are promoting agriculture as a dynamic, innovative, rewarding and vibrant industry and sparking the next generations’ interest in an agricultural career.
Yet the retention rate in university agriculture based courses is far from ideal. Where are we going wrong? How do we fix this?
Today’s post by guest blogger Art4agriculture’s communication manager Victoria Taylor who blogs at http://flourishfiles.typepad.com/flourishfiles/ reflects on this serious problem for future food security and our investment in young people
10 January 2012
AgSci and the Shrinking Workforce – by Victoria Taylor
This morning, @OzPIEF tweeted a statistic from the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations stating that employment in Agriculture declined by 94,400 (24.9%) over the 10 years to November 2011.
This caused me to reflect on two other Twitter posts that caught my attention recently.
“The proportion of university-trained employees in the industry is not as high as it should be. We desperately need to attract more students into agricultural careers.”
That’s nothing new to those of us who work in or with agricultural industries and the statistics back him up. In 2005 the Productivity Commission in their research paper “Trends in Australian Agriculture” found that the proportion of people working in agriculture with a degree was around 7% whereas 22% of the community as a whole had a degree.
The other tweet was by @KondininGroup which referred to Victorian Farmers Federation concerns that the higher education base funding review has recommended raising the fees for agricultural courses at university by up to 25%.
It seems incongruous that these two pronouncements can co-exist. How can the answer to low enrolments in Agricultural Science (AgSci) be to increase fees?
But it made me think about what may be contributing to a low take up of AgSci degrees. I don’t think fees tell the whole story.
Why are some Agricultural Science degrees still four years long?
Agricultural Science is a complex and technical subject area but computer science, accounting, journalism and even many straight Science degrees are only three years. I don’t think it could be said that those students spending an extra year in Agricultural Science are rewarded financially for their efforts on graduation.
Why are so many Agricultural Science degrees inflexible?
I accept that AgSci provides graduates with a comprehensive understanding across a range of disciplines. I am continually reminded that a solid grounding in basic science is transferable across a number industries, which serves graduates and agriculture well. I wonder though, if a student is ultimately interested in animal nutrition, why do some degrees insist they study agronomy for three years before they can specialise?
What is the link between AgSci and Farming?
An AgSci degree doesn’t teach you how to farm, it teaches the science that underpins agricultural production. So an industry leader told me recently when discussing this issue. Some students are therefore disillusioned when they get to university and find the degree is focussed on science, not farming.
Why can’t we retain students in Agricultural Science courses?
I guess some of the above points may contribute to low retention rates. One farmer told me of the 100+ students in their first year only 4 graduated. Where did all those young people go? Well, some transferred to straight Science where they had more freedom to pursue their interests, some went home to the farm questioning the degree’s relevance to their family’s operations and some had just changed their minds about what they wanted to do…which is the right of all young people of course!
I’d like to add a lack of clarity about career paths to the list.
Many of you can think of at least a dozen people in highly diverse careers in agriculture – agronomists, bankers, PR people, scientists, advisers, lobbyists, farmers, machinery dealers, policy makers…etc
If a student decides at the end of first year that they don’t want to be an agronomist or farmer anymore, how do we let them know there are a number of other career options open to AgSci graduates?
Apart from encounters with family and friends, how often do we take the time to engage with young people to demonstrate how rewarding and diverse a career in agriculture can be?
We owe it to ourselves, to protect the investment we’ve made in our businesses and industries and to secure the future of food and fibre production, to support and invest in our young people.
A new group of school-leavers are about to start their AgSci degrees…what will YOU do to keep them there?